| JE documentation | Contained in the JE distribution. |
JE::Number - JavaScript number value
use JE; use JE::Number; $j = JE->new; $js_num = new JE::Number $j, 17; $perl_num = $js_num->value; $js_num->to_object; # returns a new JE::Object::Number
This class implements JavaScript number values for JE. The difference between this and JE::Object::Number is that that module implements number objects, while this module implements the primitive values.
Right now, this module simply uses Perl numbers underneath for storing the JavaScript numbers. It seems that whether Perl numbers are in accord with the IEEE 754 standard that ECMAScript uses is system-dependent. If anyone requires IEEE 754 compliancy, a patch would be welcome. :-)
The new method accepts a global (JE) object and a number as its
two arguments. If the latter is an object with a to_number method whose
return value isa JE::Number, that object's internal value
will be used. Otherwise the arg itself is used. (The precise details of
the behaviour of new when the second arg is a object are subject to
change.) It is numified Perl-style,
so 'nancy' becomes NaN
and 'information' becomes Infinity.
The value method produces a Perl scalar. The 0+ numeric operator is
overloaded and produces the same.
Stringification and boolification are overloaded and produce the same results as in JavaScript
The typeof and class methods produce the strings 'number' and
'Number', respectively.
| JE documentation | Contained in the JE distribution. |
package JE::Number; our $VERSION = '0.042'; use strict; use warnings; no warnings 'utf8'; # I need constants for inf and nan, because perl 5.8.6 interprets the # strings "inf" and "nan" as 0 in numeric context. # This is what I get running Deparse on 5.8.6: # $ perl -mO=Deparse -e 'print 0+"nan"' # print 0; # $ perl -mO=Deparse -e 'print 0+"inf"' # print 0; # And here is the output from 5.8.8 (PPC [big-endian]): # $ perl -mO=Deparse -e 'print 0+"nan"' # print unpack("F", pack("h*", "f78f000000000000")); # $ perl -mO=Deparse -e 'print 0+"inf"' # print 9**9**9; # I don't know about 5.8.7. # However, that 'unpack' does not work on little-endian Xeons running # Linux. What I'm testing it on is running 5.8.5, so the above one-liners # don't work. But I can use this: # $ perl -mO=Deparse -mPOSIX=fmod -e 'use constant nan=>fmod 0,0;print nan' # use POSIX (split(/,/, 'fmod', 0)); # use constant ('nan', fmod(0, 0)); # print sin(9**9**9); # sin 9**9**9 also works on the PPC. use constant nan => sin 9**9**9; use constant inf => 9**9**9; use overload fallback => 1, '""' => sub { my $value = $_[0][0]; $value == inf ? 'Infinity' : $value == -+inf ? '-Infinity' : $value == $value ? $value : 'NaN' }, '0+' => 'value', bool => sub { my $value = $_[0][0]; $value && $value == $value; }, '+' => sub { $_[0]->value + $_[1] }, # ~~~ I shouldnât need this, # but perlâs magic # auto-generation # isnât so magic. # cmp => sub { "$_[0]" cmp $_[1] }; ; use Scalar::Util qw 'blessed tainted'; require JE::String; require JE::Boolean; require JE::Object::Number; # Each JE::Number object is an array ref like this: [value, global object] sub new { my ($class,$global,$val) = @_; if(defined blessed $val and can $val 'to_number') { my $new_val = $val->to_number; ref $new_val eq $class and return $new_val; eval { $new_val->isa(__PACKAGE__) } and $val = $new_val->[0], goto RETURN; } $val = _numify($val); RETURN: bless [$val, $global], $class; } sub _numify { my $val = shift||0; # For perls that don't interpret 0+"inf" as inf: if ($val =~ /^\s*([+-]?)(inf|nan)/i) { $val = lc $2 eq 'nan' ? nan : $1 eq '-' ? -(inf) : inf; } else { $val+=0 } $val; } sub prop { if(@_ > 2) { return $_[2] } # If there is a value, just return it my ($self, $name) = @_; $$self[1]->prototype_for('Number')->prop($name); } sub keys { my $self = shift; $$self[1]->prototype_for('Number')->keys; } sub delete {1} sub method { my $self = shift; $$self[1]->prototype_for('Number')->prop(shift)->apply( $self,$$self[1]->upgrade(@_) ); } sub value { shift->[0] } sub exists { !1 } sub typeof { 'number' } sub class { 'Number' } sub id { my $value = shift->value; # This should (I hope) take care of systems that stringify nan and # inf oddly: 'num:' . ($value != $value ? 'nan' : $value == inf ? 'inf' : $value == -+inf ? '-inf' : $value) } sub primitive { 1 } sub to_primitive { $_[0] } sub to_boolean { my $value = (my $self = shift)->[0]; JE::Boolean->new($$self[1], $value && $value == $value); } sub to_string { # ~~~ I need to find out whether Perl's number # stringification is consistent with E 9.8.1 for # finite numbers. my $value = (my $self = shift)->[0]; JE::String->_new($$self[1], $value == inf ? 'Infinity' : $value == -(inf) ? '-Infinity' : $value == $value ? $value : 'NaN' ); } *to_number = \& to_primitive; sub to_object { my $self = shift; JE::Object::Number->new($$self[1], $self); } sub global { $_[0][1] } sub taint { my $self = shift; tainted $self->[0] and return $self; my $alter_ego = [@$self]; no warnings 'numeric'; $alter_ego->[0] += shift(); return bless $alter_ego, ref $self; }